Skip to content

test(browser): locate controlled Agent Task targets semantically - #100

Draft
seonghobae wants to merge 22 commits into
test/agent-task-process-set-evidencefrom
test/agent-task-semantic-role-name-locator
Draft

test(browser): locate controlled Agent Task targets semantically#100
seonghobae wants to merge 22 commits into
test/agent-task-process-set-evidencefrom
test/agent-task-semantic-role-name-locator

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Partial implementation of #28, stacked on PR #73.

Fresh live stack

Current prerequisite #73 exact head is 3353e9ba3af9986e49df5c6383d4777eda770357. Current #100 exact head is 722ea29b479c4a0b6c79a4538c8b98e5b10b3215.

Fresh exact comparison reports ahead 22 / behind 0 with merge base equal to the exact live prerequisite SHA. GitHub currently reports this Draft mergeable.

Child-owned behavior

This child adds bounded exact browser-computed role/name discovery for the controlled Agent Task input, submit action, and result surface; rejects zero, duplicate, malformed, or over-budget semantic candidates; verifies the result semantics and observable submission state; retains only a bounded SHA-256 representation of the synthetic structured result; and preserves bounded WebDriver/cleanup/resource evidence without converting page-controlled text into authority.

During exact-head repair, current CI exposed two real reconstruction defects: recoverable http.client.HTTPException failures were no longer normalized into failed trial evidence, and inherited valid-success fixtures omitted the newer result-semantic evidence fields. Both were repaired on this canonical branch. An accidentally omitted parent-owned RSS helper was detected from the intervening exact commit diff and restored before final validation.

Exact-head evidence

For unchanged exact head 722ea29b479c4a0b6c79a4538c8b98e5b10b3215:

  • CI run 33398093603: success.
    • Rust contracts job 99507473045: success — exact checkout, Python repository contracts, formatting, workspace check, full tests, strict Clippy, and rustdoc all passed.
    • Production coverage job 99507473316: success — exact enforcement reports production functions, lines, regions, and branches are 100% covered.
    • Exact coverage artifact 9760241927, digest sha256:cb913b27123676c1d5ea7560a32eac2826c7c762e8c6a366f8acc510721ca5e6.
  • Manifest V3 Compatibility run 33398093613: success on the same exact head.
  • Formal reviews: none.
  • Inline review threads: none.

No predecessor result is transferred to this head. Passing automation is not independent approval.

Current disposition

Keep Draft while the stack remains under review. This remains controlled real-browser test-harness evidence and does not claim a shipped browser adapter or complete issue #28. This scheduled actor does not merge, self-approve, force-push, destructively rebase, alter workflows/rulesets/secrets, weaken checks, tag, release, or publish.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Attach the existing semantic role/name locator and bounded structured-value evidence tree to the current PR #73 process-evidence head without changing the child-only file delta. No predecessor checks or reviews are transferred.
…play

Replace the stale-child tree attached by the predecessor merge with the exact live #73 tree, preserving only the three child files whose old prerequisite content is unchanged on #73. Runner and contract changes are deliberately withheld for semantic replay against the live parent.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant